PSG 6–1 Slovan Bratislava: Full Match Statistics, xG and Detailed Analysis

Paris Saint-Germain produced a dominant attacking display as they defeated Slovan Bratislava 6–1, taking control of the match from the opening stages and turning a 3–0 half-time advantage into an emphatic victory after the break.

PSG's superiority is clearly reflected in the statistics. Luis Enrique's side finished with 72% possession, 35 shots, 14 shots on target, eight big chances and 4.70 expected goals (xG). Slovan Bratislava, by comparison, managed 28% possession, nine shots, four attempts on target and just one big chance.

Ousmane Dembele was central to PSG's first-half dominance, scoring twice and contributing an assist, while Ferran Torres also produced a hat-trick of goals across the match. Fabian Ruiz completed PSG's sixth goal late in the game.

Slovan did manage a consolation goal through Suleiman Camara, but it did little to change the overall pattern of the contest.

---

PSG 6–1 Slovan Bratislava: Match Summary

Statistic	PSG	Slovan Bratislava
Final score	6	1
Half-time score	3	0
Expected goals (xG)	4.70	0.64
Possession	72%	28%
Total shots	35	9
Shots on target	14	4
Big chances	8	1
Corners	7	2
Pass accuracy	92%	74%
Yellow cards	0	1
xG on target	5.82	1.03

Statistics source: Flashscore.mobi

The numbers tell the story of a match overwhelmingly controlled by PSG.

---

PSG's 4.70 xG Shows the Scale of Their Dominance

One of the clearest indicators of PSG's superiority was the 4.70 expected goals they accumulated.

Slovan Bratislava recorded only 0.64 xG.

That means PSG created opportunities worth more than seven times the expected-goal value of their opponents.

The xG figure is particularly significant because it wasn't produced by one isolated chance. PSG generated a sustained stream of dangerous opportunities throughout the match.

The commentary illustrates this pattern.

Within the opening three minutes, Dro Fernandez forced an excellent save from Dominik Takac. PSG then had further attempts blocked inside the penalty area before Nuno Mendes struck the post.

Those early chances help explain why PSG's xG quickly became substantial.

Ousmane Dembele eventually opened the scoring in the 17th minute after reacting quickest to a rebound.

The French side continued creating opportunities after the breakthrough, with Dembele going close again before scoring his second goal six minutes later.

PSG then added a third before half-time.

The 4.70 xG therefore accurately reflects the sustained quality and quantity of PSG's attacking opportunities.

---

72% Possession vs 28%: PSG Controlled the Match

PSG enjoyed 72% possession, leaving Slovan with only 28%.

This was one of the most important differences between the teams.

Possession itself does not guarantee victory, but in this case it was accompanied by:

• 35 shots
• 14 shots on target
• 8 big chances
• 57 touches in the opposition box
• 675 completed passes
• 89% passing accuracy in the final third

That combination shows that PSG weren't simply passing the ball around without purpose.

They used possession to move Slovan backwards, enter dangerous areas and create repeated scoring opportunities.

Slovan had significantly less time on the ball and therefore fewer opportunities to establish sustained attacking pressure.

---

PSG Produced 35 Shots to Slovan's 9

The shooting numbers were heavily weighted towards the home side.

PSG registered 35 total shots, while Slovan managed just 9.

That is a difference of 26 attempts.

Even more important was the quality of those attempts.

Shots

Shooting statistic	PSG	Slovan
Total shots	35	9
On target	14	4
Off target	15	2
Blocked	6	3
Inside box	23	5
Outside box	12	4

PSG had 23 shots inside the penalty area, compared with only five from Slovan.

That is a major indication of territorial dominance.

Rather than relying primarily on speculative efforts from distance, PSG repeatedly managed to penetrate the visitors' defensive area.

The commentary supports this.

Dembele had opportunities inside the box, Dro Fernandez received the ball in dangerous positions, Hakimi found shooting space, and Ferran Torres repeatedly attacked the penalty area.

---

14 Shots on Target Demonstrate PSG's Accuracy

PSG put 14 of their 35 shots on target.

Slovan managed only four.

That means PSG tested the goalkeeper far more frequently.

Dominik Takac was forced into several important saves, particularly during the opening stages when PSG were already creating dangerous opportunities.

At the other end, Matvey Safonov faced fewer shots but still had to make several interventions, including saves from Barseghyan and Camara.

PSG's 14 shots on target also help explain their high 5.82 xGOT.

---

xGOT: PSG Reached 5.82

PSG finished with an impressive 5.82 expected goals on target (xGOT).

Slovan registered only 1.03 xGOT.

xGOT considers the quality and placement of shots that actually reach the target, making it useful for examining both finishing and goalkeeper workload.

PSG's 5.82 figure indicates that their shots on target were generally dangerous.

This is consistent with the match events.

Takac was required to make several strong saves, including an excellent stop from Dembele during the first half and another intervention against Dro Fernandez late in the match.

PSG eventually converted six goals.

---

Eight Big Chances vs One

Perhaps the most striking attacking statistic was the 8–1 advantage in big chances.

PSG created eight major opportunities.

Slovan created only one.

That difference shows why the final score became so one-sided.

PSG were not merely shooting more often. They were repeatedly creating situations from which goals could realistically be expected.

The first half alone included several excellent opportunities before the score reached 3–0.

After the interval, PSG continued attacking rather than simply protecting their advantage.

---

PSG Dominated Inside the Penalty Area

PSG recorded 23 shots inside the box, compared with five for Slovan.

They also registered 57 touches in the opposition penalty area.

Slovan had only 11.

The difference of 46 touches is enormous.

It demonstrates how frequently PSG managed to move the ball into dangerous attacking zones.

The goals also reflected this approach.

Dembele's opening goal came from a rebound inside the area. His second was a header. Torres scored from inside the box after a cross from Dembele, while Fabian Ruiz eventually finished from a rebound.

PSG consistently got players into positions where they could attack the goal rather than settling for long-range attempts.

---

7 Corners to 2

PSG won seven corners, while Slovan earned two.

The corner count further reflects PSG's territorial advantage.

Their repeated attacks forced Slovan defenders to block crosses and shots and put the ball behind.

One of those situations led to Dembele's opening goal after PSG worked a corner short and continued the attack.

Slovan had fewer opportunities to threaten from corners, although one late set piece produced a good chance for Mustafic that Safonov saved.

---

PSG's Passing Was Exceptional

PSG completed 675 of 733 passes, giving them a passing accuracy of 92%.

Slovan completed 212 of 285, recording 74%.

Passing statistic	PSG	Slovan
Pass accuracy	92%	74%
Completed/attempted	675/733	212/285
Long passes	80% (32/40)	45% (23/51)
Final-third passes	89% (254/287)	65% (40/62)
Crosses	29% (4/14)	25% (1/4)

The passing statistics show that PSG maintained technical control as well as territorial control.

A 92% overall completion rate is particularly impressive given the enormous volume of passes attempted.

The team also completed 254 of 287 passes in the final third, equivalent to 89%.

That indicates PSG were able to maintain accurate circulation even in areas where pressure is normally much greater.

---

PSG's Final-Third Passing Was a Major Advantage

The final-third numbers are particularly revealing.

PSG completed 254 of 287 final-third passes.

Slovan completed just 40 of 62.

This means PSG were significantly more effective at moving the ball around the attacking zone.

Their ability to maintain possession near the opposition penalty area helped create repeated opportunities.

This was visible throughout the commentary.

PSG repeatedly combined around the edge of the box before finding shooting opportunities for Dembele, Torres, Hakimi, Akliouche, Ruiz and others.

---

Long Passing: PSG Were Also More Accurate

PSG completed 32 of 40 long passes, an impressive 80%.

Slovan completed 23 of 51, only 45%.

This suggests PSG were not limited to short combinations.

They could also switch the point of attack and find teammates with longer distribution.

Slovan's lower long-pass accuracy suggests they struggled to use direct distribution consistently.

That may have contributed to their difficulty escaping PSG's pressure.

---

Expected Assists: PSG Created Far More

PSG recorded 2.28 expected assists (xA).

Slovan recorded 0.54.

The difference demonstrates PSG's superiority in chance creation.

Expected assists measure the quality of passes that lead to shots, meaning PSG's 2.28 figure indicates that their passing generated substantially more dangerous shooting opportunities.

Dembele was especially influential.

He scored twice and provided the cross that Torres converted for the third goal.

His involvement therefore went beyond finishing.

---

PSG Won the Territory Battle

The 57–11 advantage in touches inside the opposition box is one of the clearest statistics in the entire match.

PSG had 57 touches.

Slovan had only 11.

This means PSG spent far more time operating close to the opponent's goal.

It also explains why their shot count, xG and big chances were so much higher.

Slovan's limited attacking presence meant Safonov had a comparatively quieter night despite conceding once.

---

Through Passes: PSG 2–0 Slovan

PSG completed two accurate through passes, while Slovan registered none.

Although the number is small, it shows PSG were able to find openings behind the defensive structure.

The visitors' deeper defensive shape meant through balls were not always necessary, but PSG still managed to produce them.

---

Offsides: PSG 4–1 Slovan

PSG were caught offside four times, while Slovan were flagged once.

The higher PSG figure can actually be interpreted partly as a consequence of their aggressive attacking approach.

With forwards constantly attempting to run beyond defenders, there was a greater possibility of players moving too early.

Slovan's one offside reflects their considerably lower attacking volume.

---

Free Kicks: Slovan Had the Advantage

Slovan Bratislava were awarded eight free kicks, compared with six for PSG.

This was one of the few statistical categories in which the visitors had the higher number.

However, it did not translate into sustained attacking dominance.

Slovan did have some promising set-piece situations, including a dangerous free kick from Barseghyan that was comfortably saved by Safonov.

---

Crosses: PSG Attempted More

PSG completed four of 14 crosses, while Slovan completed one of four.

The home side therefore attempted substantially more deliveries from wide areas.

This fits the match pattern, with PSG frequently attacking from the flanks before looking for teammates inside the penalty area.

Dembele's delivery for Torres' third goal was a perfect example of how PSG's wide play could produce a goal.

---

Defensive Statistics

Defensive statistic	PSG	Slovan
Fouls	8	6
Tackles won	64% (9/14)	71% (15/21)
Duels won	35	44
Clearances	5	25
Interceptions	6	8
Errors leading to shot	1	2
Errors leading to goal	0	2

Interestingly, Slovan won more tackles proportionally and more overall duels, but that did not prevent PSG from dominating the match.

This is an important distinction.

Defensive actions can show how much work a team is doing, but they do not necessarily indicate which team controlled the match.

---

Slovan Made 25 Clearances

Slovan registered 25 clearances, compared with only five from PSG.

This is a huge difference.

It is another statistical indication of how much time Slovan spent defending near their own goal.

PSG's sustained attacks forced Slovan defenders to repeatedly remove the ball from dangerous areas.

The five clearances recorded by PSG indicate that the home side were much less frequently under prolonged defensive pressure.

---

Slovan's 44 Duels Won Were Not Enough

Slovan won 44 duels, compared with PSG's 35.

On the surface, this may look like a positive statistic for the visitors.

However, the overall match context is more important.

PSG still dominated possession, shots, xG, big chances, touches in the box and passing.

This demonstrates why individual defensive battles do not always translate into overall control.

Slovan could win challenges but still struggle to prevent PSG from creating the next attacking move.

---

Goalkeeping Analysis

The goalkeeping statistics were:

Goalkeeping statistic	PSG	Slovan
Saves	3	8
xGOT faced	1.03	5.82
Goals prevented	0.03	-0.18
Goal kicks	2	17

Dominik Takac had to make eight saves.

That is consistent with the 14 shots on target PSG produced.

Several of his saves were significant, especially early in the game when PSG were searching for the opening goal.

Matvey Safonov made three saves.

His most important moments came when Slovan managed to break forward and test him, including efforts from Barseghyan and Camara.

---

What Does the -0.18 Goals Prevented Figure Mean?

Slovan's goalkeeper recorded -0.18 goals prevented.

This statistic should be interpreted carefully.

It suggests that, based on the quality of the shots faced, the goalkeeper conceded slightly more than the model would have expected from those shots on target.

However, the figure is relatively small compared with the overall dominance of PSG.

The larger story is that Takac faced a huge volume of dangerous attempts.

---

PSG's First-Half Performance

The first half was essentially a statement of intent from PSG.

They created an excellent chance within the opening minutes, with Takac denying Dro Fernandez.

Nuno Mendes then hit the post, while other PSG attacks produced blocked efforts.

The pressure finally produced the breakthrough in the 17th minute when Dembele reacted quickly to a rebound.

Dembele doubled the advantage six minutes later with a header.

Ferran Torres then made it 3–0 in the 31st minute after being found by Dembele.

PSG went into half-time three goals ahead, having established a commanding advantage.

---

Dembele Was the Catalyst

Ousmane Dembele's performance was arguably the defining individual display of the first half.

He scored PSG's first two goals and assisted Torres for the third.

His movement caused repeated problems for Slovan's defence.

He was also involved in several other chances, including an attempt that struck the post after PSG had created another dangerous attack.

His contribution demonstrates why the final scoreline cannot be explained simply by PSG's possession.

Their key attackers were repeatedly turning possession into genuine goal-scoring opportunities.

---

Ferran Torres Continued the Damage

Ferran Torres was another major contributor.

He scored PSG's third goal before adding the fourth shortly after half-time.

His second goal came from outside the penalty area after receiving a pass from Akliouche.

He then completed his hat-trick in the 57th minute following a Dembele delivery from a corner.

That gave PSG a 5–0 lead.

Torres' three goals made him one of the standout performers of the match.

---

Slovan's Brief Response

Despite being completely outplayed for much of the match, Slovan did produce a moment of individual quality.

At 58 minutes, Suleiman Camara carried the ball forward and completed an excellent individual move with a powerful finish into the top corner.

It reduced the deficit to 5–1.

However, Slovan were unable to build momentum from the goal.

PSG continued creating chances and remained in control.

---

PSG's Substitutions Maintained Control

Luis Enrique made a number of changes around the hour mark.

Hakimi, Dembele, Mendes, Pacho and other regular starters were withdrawn, giving fresh players an opportunity to contribute.

The changes did not significantly reduce PSG's attacking threat.

Mayulu, Godts, Digne, Hernandez and Beraldo all entered the match.

PSG continued generating shots and corners after the substitutions.

That depth was another major difference between the teams.

---

Fabian Ruiz Completes the 6–1 Victory

The sixth PSG goal arrived in the 87th minute.

Fabian Ruiz reacted quickest to a rebound and drove the ball into the bottom corner.

That completed a six-goal PSG performance.

The timing of the goal was significant because it demonstrated that PSG continued attacking even after the contest had effectively been decided.

---

Why PSG Won 6–1

Several factors explain the final result.

1. PSG created far more chances

The xG difference was enormous:

PSG 4.70 – 0.64 Slovan

2. PSG dominated possession

The hosts controlled 72% of the ball.

3. PSG attacked the penalty area repeatedly

They had 23 shots inside the box and 57 touches in the opposition area.

4. PSG tested the goalkeeper constantly

They produced 14 shots on target.

5. PSG passed the ball with exceptional accuracy

Their 92% passing accuracy allowed them to maintain pressure.

6. PSG created eight big chances

Slovan created only one.

7. Slovan spent too much time defending

Their 25 clearances compared with PSG's five demonstrate the pressure they faced.

---

Complete Statistical Comparison

Category	PSG	Slovan Bratislava
Score	6	1
xG	4.70	0.64
xGOT	5.82	1.03
Possession	72%	28%
Shots	35	9
Shots on target	14	4
Shots off target	15	2
Blocked shots	6	3
Shots inside box	23	5
Shots outside box	12	4
Woodwork	2	0
Big chances	8	1
Corners	7	2
Touches in opposition box	57	11
Through passes	2	0
Offsides	4	1
Free kicks	6	8
Pass accuracy	92%	74%
Long-pass accuracy	80%	45%
Final-third pass accuracy	89%	65%
Crosses	29%	25%
xA	2.28	0.54
Throw-ins	17	10
Fouls	8	6
Tackles won	64%	71%
Duels won	35	44
Clearances	5	25
Interceptions	6	8
Errors leading to shot	1	2
Errors leading to goal	0	2
Saves	3	8
Goal kicks	2	17

Statistics source: Flashscore.mobi

---

Final Verdict

PSG's 6–1 victory over Slovan Bratislava was backed up by almost every major statistical category.

The French side had 72% possession, produced 35 shots, recorded 14 attempts on target, created eight big chances and accumulated 4.70 xG.

Slovan's nine shots and 0.64 xG demonstrate just how difficult it was for the visitors to generate sustained attacking pressure.

Ousmane Dembele's two goals and assist gave PSG the early momentum, while Ferran Torres' hat-trick ensured the advantage became overwhelming. Fabian Ruiz then added the sixth goal late in the match.

Slovan did find a moment of individual brilliance through Suleiman Camara, but their 1–0 goal was little more than a consolation.

Ultimately, the 6–1 scoreline was consistent with the statistical picture. PSG dominated possession, territory, chance creation, passing and shooting, while Slovan were forced into prolonged defensive work.

For MatchStatsLab readers, the most revealing numbers are perhaps 4.70–0.64 xG, 35–9 shots, 14–4 shots on target, 8–1 big chances and 57–11 touches in the opposition box.

Those figures provide a statistical explanation for one of PSG's most convincing performances.

Statistics credit: Flashscore.mobi.